The answers you would otherwise open twenty repositories to find

Everything below is computed from evidence your systems already produce. Where the evidence is missing, the answer is “not measured” — never a guess that looks like a measurement.

It does not rank you

ShipReady has no per-developer score, no leaderboard, and no productivity ranking — not as a setting, but as a product invariant with a test that fails the build if one is ever added. It measures repositories and systems. The one place a person’s name appears is AI-authorship attribution, which is a disclosure about code, carries no grade, and feeds no score.

One fix-first queue, not twenty tabs

Every open finding across your repositories in one list, ordered by what is actually true of each one — exploited in the wild first, then how far past its own remediation deadline it is. Every row says why it is where it is, so you can disagree with the order.

What gets measured

Where the debt actually is

Which repositories have no tests, no CI, no type checking, no context docs for AI tools — with the evidence behind each, and an explicit 'not readable' where a token could not see it rather than a failing check you did not earn.

Estimate technical debt

Delivery signals without a spreadsheet

Lead time, deployment frequency and change-failure rate read from the systems you already use. Measured where the data supports it and left empty where it does not — never a number assembled from a survey.

Check DORA metrics

End-of-life before it is an incident

Runtimes and dependencies approaching or past end of support, dated from published lifecycles rather than guessed from version numbers.

See the domains

What it costs

Priced per active contributor. A single developer can use the first tier for their own work — there is no team minimum on it. Viewers are never billed.

See pricing