Resources
Material to read, share, and use to evaluate ShipReady — the white paper, executive one-pagers, and our delivery partners.
Start with the question you are being asked
Most people arrive here with one of two questions from a board, a buyer, or an investor. Either they need to show how well their engineering organization actually runs, or they need to show that their security and compliance controls are real. These two pages are the shortest path to each answer, and pricing tells you what it costs to get the answer from your own systems.
- Engineering intelligence
Delivery, security, debt, and lifecycle metrics computed from the tools you connect.
- Compliance readiness
Every control backed by live evidence, or clearly marked Not Verified.
- Pricing
What each plan includes.
How to use these resources
If you are evaluating ShipReady for your own team, read the white paper first. It sets out the thesis and the operating model: why executives need a technology investment layer, and how ShipReady scores it from real systems rather than from self-reported answers.
If you need to brief someone else, the one-pagers are built to be printed or forwarded as they are. The sales one-pager is written for an executive buyer; the investor one-pager covers the category and the market. Neither asks the reader to sign up.
If you are comparing tools, Where ShipReady fits lays out where engineering-intelligence tools, compliance-automation tools, and ShipReady each sit, including what ShipReady leaves out by design. The guides library goes deeper on individual frameworks, metrics, and terms. ShipReady vs GitHub is the only named-vendor page here, because that is the system most teams already have connected.
The rules we write by
Everything here follows the same rules as the product. We do not publish a number we cannot trace to a source, we do not claim a certification we do not hold, and we do not describe a feature as available before it is. When something is in beta, the page says so.
Comparisons are written at the level of categories, not individual vendors, and they name the jobs where another kind of tool is the better choice. If a claim on any of these pages does not hold up, we want to know.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the difference between Resources and Docs?
- Docs explain how the product works and how to use it. Resources are material to read, share, and use while you evaluate ShipReady: the white paper, the one-pagers, the partner network, and the guides library.
- Can I share the one-pagers outside my company?
- Yes. The sales and investor one-pagers are designed to be printed or forwarded as they are, without an account.
- Where should I start if I only have a few minutes?
- Start with engineering intelligence if your question is about how well the engineering organization runs, or compliance readiness if your question is about security and compliance controls. Both pages link to the deeper guides.
- Is the comparison page a ranking of competitors?
- No. It describes three different jobs and which kind of tool fits each. Its comparisons are category-level, not per-vendor scorecards, and it marks what ShipReady leaves out by design.
- Who are the design and delivery partners?
- The teams who architect the infrastructure and staff the craft behind ShipReady, and the products shipped together. The partners page lists each one with a real, verifiable footprint.
- How do I compare ShipReady with the tools I already use?
- Read Where ShipReady fits for the category view, then ShipReady vs GitHub for what repository analytics already cover. Each page says where the other category is the better fit.
- Where do the guides fit?
- The guides library is the reference shelf: framework explainers, a glossary of engineering and compliance terms, and longer pieces on metrics and AI readiness. Start from a pillar page and follow its links into the guides when you need depth.
- Do I need an account to read any of this?
- No. Everything listed on this page is public. You only need an account when you want ShipReady to score your own systems.