Operational guidance, not legal advice. This page distills named public sources (regulator guidance and industry practice). It is not a legal determination, not a notification decision, and not a substitute for your counsel, insurer, or a retained DFIR firm. Verify applicability and current deadlines for your facts and jurisdiction.
What training-content summary does the EU AI Act require?
Updated
Article 53(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 is a public training-content summary for GPAI providers, according to the AI Office template. Article 50 is a different duty: labeling and marking AI-generated content. Not legal advice. This page does not determine that YOU have to publish a summary.
AI training-data transparency, last verified 9 September 2026 against Articles 50, 53(1)(d), 53(2), 111(3) and 113 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (OJ L 2024/1689, 12.7.2024) and Recital 107. The AI Office Explanatory Notice and Template for the Public Summary of Training Content (library page of 24 July 2025) is the template Article 53(1)(d) points to. Commission AI Act pages, the GPAI Code of Practice, and Commission transparency guidelines for Article 50 are Commission / AI Office materials — guidance, not the regulation. This page is not legal advice, not a filing, not a determination that YOU have to publish a training-content summary, and does not start a clock.
This is Article 53(1)(d) versus Article 50, not YOUR summary
Audience: a GPAI-model provider, engineering lead, or counsel walking Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on training-content transparency. This page is not legal advice. It does not start a clock. Reading it does not start a clock. Mapping a row is not a determination that the Act applies, that YOU are a GPAI provider, or that YOU have to publish a training-content summary. This page does not file with the AI Office. This product does not publish YOUR summary.
The AI Act is Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of 13 June 2024, OJ L 2024/1689, 12.7.2024. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj. Article 53(1)(d) is the GPAI public training-content summary. Article 50 is a different duty: transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems, including labeling and marking of AI-generated content. They are not the same article. The EU AI Act overview on this site is the pillar page. The GPAI-requirements guide on this site is the Article 53 baseline page. Last verified 9 September 2026. Not legal advice.
- Statute versus guidance versus template: Articles 50, 53(1)(d), 53(2), 111(3) and 113 of 2024/1689 are legal requirements only if they apply. Recital 107 is a recital, not an operative article. The AI Office training-content-summary template is the template the article points to — AI Office material on the form, not a substitute for the article. Commission AI Act pages, the GPAI Code of Practice, and Commission Article 50 transparency guidelines are Commission / AI Office materials — guidance, not the regulation. This page quotes which kind of text it is relying on.
- The requirements-in-force-2026 guide on this site is the Article 113 dates page. The GPAI-requirements guide on this site is the Article 53 baseline page. The technical-documentation guide on this site is the Articles 11 and 53 Annex IV/XI/XII page. The copyright-policy guide on this site is the Article 53(1)(c) page.
- This page does not invent a 2 August 2026 start date for the GPAI training-content summary. Article 53 sits in Chapter V. Article 113(b) applies Chapter V from 2 August 2025, with the exception of Article 101. Article 53(1)(d) therefore applies from 2 August 2025 under Article 113(b), except Article 101. It did not start on 2 August 2026. Article 50 sits in Chapter IV. Chapter IV is not named in Article 113(b). Article 50 therefore sits on the original 2 August 2026 residual under Article 113 second paragraph. Those dates are not one number. Article 113(c) of 2024/1689 keeps Article 6(1) and the corresponding obligations — Annex I product-embedded high-risk — on 2 August 2027, not 2 August 2026. This page does not invent a 2 August 2026 date for Annex I.
Article 53(1)(d) is not Article 50
Do not conflate them. Article 53(1)(d) is a public summary of the content used to train a general-purpose AI model, drawn up according to a template provided by the AI Office. Article 50 is transparency for certain AI systems: informing people they are interacting with an AI system, machine-readable marking of synthetic outputs, and deployer labeling of deep fakes and certain public-interest text. A GPAI training-content summary is not an Article 50 watermark. An Article 50 label is not an Article 53(1)(d) summary. Mapping a row is not a finding that either duty binds YOU. Last verified 9 September 2026. Not legal advice.
| Track | What the cited text is | Kind of text | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Article 53(1)(d) — public training-content summary | Providers of general-purpose AI models shall draw up and make publicly available a sufficiently detailed summary about the content used for training of the general-purpose AI model, according to a template provided by the AI Office. Legal requirement if YOU are a GPAI provider. In force 2 August 2025 via Article 113(b). This page does not determine that YOU are a GPAI provider and does not determine that YOU have to publish a summary. | Article 53(1)(d) of 2024/1689. Legal requirement, only if it applies. Distinct from Article 50. This product does not publish YOUR summary. | 9 September 2026 |
| Article 50 — labeling and marking of AI-generated content | Transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems, including informing natural persons they are interacting with an AI system, machine-readable marking of synthetic audio, image, video or text, and deployer disclosure of deep fakes and certain public-interest text. Legal requirement if those Article 50 limbs apply. In force 2 August 2026 under Article 113 second paragraph. Distinct from Article 53(1)(d). | Article 50 of 2024/1689. Legal requirement, only if it applies. Distinct from Article 53(1)(d). Commission Article 50 guidelines and the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content are guidance, not the regulation. | 9 September 2026 |
| Article 3(63) versus Article 3(1) — different gates | Article 3(63) defines a general-purpose AI model. That definition is the gate for Article 53, including the public training-content summary. Article 3(1) defines an AI system. Article 50 is a system-level transparency duty. A GPAI model is not automatically an Article 50 AI system. An Article 50 AI system is not automatically a GPAI model. | Articles 3(1) and 3(63) of 2024/1689. Legal requirements of the definitions. This page does not classify YOUR system and does not determine that YOU are a GPAI provider. | 9 September 2026 |
| Article 53(1)(c) — copyright policy, a different GPAI point | Article 53(1)(c) is a policy to comply with Union copyright law, including DSM Directive Article 4(3) TDM reservations. It is a different point from Article 53(1)(d). Recital 108 treats the copyright-policy duty and the public summary as two obligations. The copyright-policy guide on this site is the Article 53(1)(c) page. | Article 53(1)(c) of 2024/1689. Legal requirement, only if it applies. Distinct from Article 53(1)(d). This page does not write YOUR copyright policy. | 9 September 2026 |
What original Article 53(1)(d) actually says
Last verified 9 September 2026 against Article 53 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on EUR-Lex (OJ L 2024/1689, 12.7.2024). These are legal requirements of the original regulation, only if they apply. This page does not apply them to YOU. Not legal advice.
| Point | What the cited text says | Kind of text | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Article 53(1)(d) | Authentic Article 53(1)(d): Providers of general-purpose AI models shall draw up and make publicly available a sufficiently detailed summary about the content used for training of the general-purpose AI model, according to a template provided by the AI Office. | Article 53(1)(d) of 2024/1689. Legal requirement, only if it applies. This page does not draw up YOUR summary and does not publish it. | 9 September 2026 |
| Recital 107 — comprehensive in scope, not technically detailed | Recital 107: in order to increase transparency on the data that is used in the pre-training and training of general-purpose AI models, including text and data protected by copyright law, it is adequate that providers of such models draw up and make publicly available a sufficiently detailed summary of the content used for training the general-purpose AI model. While taking into due account the need to protect trade secrets and confidential business information, this summary should be generally comprehensive in its scope instead of technically detailed to facilitate parties with legitimate interests, including copyright holders, to exercise and enforce their rights under Union law, for example by listing the main data collections or sets that went into training the model, such as large private or public databases or data archives, and by providing a narrative explanation about other data sources used. It is appropriate for the AI Office to provide a template for the summary, which should be simple, effective, and allow the provider to provide the required summary in narrative form. | Recital 107 of 2024/1689. A recital, not an operative article. It does not rewrite Article 53(1)(d). This page does not treat a recital as the article. | 9 September 2026 |
| Article 53(2) — exception for points (a) and (b) only | The obligations set out in paragraph 1, points (a) and (b), shall not apply to providers of AI models that are released under an open-source licence that allows for the access, usage, modification, and distribution of the model, and whose parameters, including the weights, the information on the model architecture, and the information on model usage, are made publicly available. This exception shall not apply to general-purpose AI models with systemic risks. Points (c) and (d) — the copyright policy and the public training-content summary — are not in that exception. This page does not qualify YOUR licence. | Article 53(2) of 2024/1689. Legal requirement of the exception, only if it applies. Counsel reads the authentic paragraph. The Commission FAQ that the public-summary duty also applies to open-source model providers is Commission material — guidance, not the regulation. | 9 September 2026 |
| Article 111(3) — models already on the market before 2 August 2025 | Providers of general-purpose AI models that have been placed on the market before 2 August 2025 shall take the necessary steps in order to comply with the obligations laid down in this Regulation by 2 August 2027. That is a legal requirement of the original regulation, only if it applies. It is not Article 113(c). This page does not decide that YOUR model was placed on the market before 2 August 2025. | Article 111(3) of 2024/1689. Legal requirement, only if it applies. Distinct from Article 113(b) and from Article 113(c). | 9 September 2026 |
The AI Office template is the form the article points to
Last verified 9 September 2026 against the Commission library page Explanatory Notice and Template for the Public Summary of Training Content for general-purpose AI models, publication 24 July 2025, at https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/explanatory-notice-and-template-public-summary-training-content-general-purpose-ai-models. Article 53(1)(d) says the summary is drawn up according to a template provided by the AI Office. That library page is the current official template URL as of last verification. This page does not invent a template URL. The template is AI Office material on the form, not a substitute for the article. Filling it is not a determination that Article 53(1)(d) is met. This product does not fill the template for you and does not publish YOUR summary.
The Commission Questions and Answers page for that template (last update 26 March 2026) describes three main sections as a uniform baseline: (1) general information identifying the provider and the model, types of training content, size per modality within broad ranges, and general characteristics; (2) list of data sources, such as publicly available datasets, private datasets, data scraped from online sources, user data and synthetic data; (3) relevant data processing aspects important for parties with legitimate interests under Union law, such as copyright, and details about the removal of illegal content. Each section allows additional information on a voluntary basis. That FAQ is Commission material — guidance on the form, not the regulation. This page does not treat the FAQ as rewriting Article 53(1)(d).
The same FAQ states that using the template is mandatory under Article 53(1)(d), that the summary should be published on the provider's official website no later than when a model is placed on the Union market, and that the summary should be updated if further training requires an update of its content, at six-month intervals or sooner if a materially significant update is required, whichever is sooner. Those publication and update details are Commission material — guidance, not the regulation. The operative article says draw up and make publicly available, according to the template. Counsel reads the article and, if useful, the FAQ as guidance. Last verified 9 September 2026. Not legal advice.
| Section as the FAQ names it | What the FAQ says it covers | Kind of text | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. General information | Details identifying the provider and the model, types of training content (for example text, video, audio), size per modality within broad ranges, and general characteristics of the training data. | Commission FAQ on the AI Office template. Guidance on the form, not the regulation. This product does not fill Section 1 for you. | 9 September 2026 |
| 2. List of data sources | Information about various data sources, such as publicly available datasets, private datasets, data scraped from online sources, user data and synthetic data. More detailed requirements for each type of source are outlined in the Template. | Commission FAQ on the AI Office template. Guidance on the form, not the regulation. This product does not list YOUR sources. | 9 September 2026 |
| 3. Relevant data processing aspects | Information on certain data processing aspects important for exercising the rights of parties with legitimate interests under Union law, such as copyright, and details about the removal of illegal content. | Commission FAQ on the AI Office template. Guidance on the form, not the regulation. Distinct from the Article 53(1)(c) copyright-policy duty. The copyright-policy guide on this site is the Article 53(1)(c) page. | 9 September 2026 |
Article 50 labeling is a different duty
Last verified 9 September 2026 against Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on EUR-Lex (OJ L 2024/1689, 12.7.2024). Article 50 is not the training-content summary. Label it separately. Mapping a row is not a finding that Article 50 binds YOU. Not legal advice.
| Point | What the cited text says | Kind of text | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Article 50(1) — interaction with an AI system | Providers shall ensure that AI systems intended to interact directly with natural persons are designed and developed in such a way that the natural persons concerned are informed that they are interacting with an AI system, unless this is obvious from the point of view of a natural person who is reasonably well-informed, observant and circumspect, taking into account the circumstances and the context of use. | Article 50(1) of 2024/1689. Legal requirement, only if it applies. Distinct from Article 53(1)(d). | 9 September 2026 |
| Article 50(2) — machine-readable marking of synthetic outputs | Providers of AI systems, including general-purpose AI systems, generating synthetic audio, image, video or text content, shall ensure that the outputs of the AI system are marked in a machine-readable format and detectable as artificially generated or manipulated. | Article 50(2) of 2024/1689. Legal requirement, only if it applies. Note: general-purpose AI systems, not the Article 3(63) GPAI-model definition. Distinct from the public training-content summary. | 9 September 2026 |
| Article 50(4) — deployer disclosure of deep fakes and certain text | Deployers of an AI system that generates or manipulates image, audio or video content constituting a deep fake shall disclose that the content has been artificially generated or manipulated. Deployers of an AI system that generates or manipulates text which is published with the purpose of informing the public on matters of public interest shall disclose that the text has been artificially generated or manipulated. Exceptions in the authentic paragraph include authorised law-enforcement use and, for text, human review with editorial responsibility. | Article 50(4) of 2024/1689. Legal requirement, only if it applies. Distinct from Article 53(1)(d). Counsel reads the authentic exceptions. | 9 September 2026 |
| Commission Article 50 guidelines and Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content | The Commission guidelines on transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems, and the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content, address marking and labeling under Article 50. Adherence to that code is voluntary. Article 50 itself is a legal requirement, only if it applies. Those materials are guidance, not the regulation, and they are not the Article 53(1)(d) template. | Commission / AI Office materials. Guidance, not the regulation. Distinct from the GPAI Code of Practice under Article 56. | 9 September 2026 |
Article 113: GPAI summary is 2 August 2025; Article 50 is 2 August 2026
Last verified 9 September 2026 against Article 113 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on EUR-Lex (OJ L 2024/1689, 12.7.2024). Article 53 sits in Chapter V. Article 113(b): Chapter III Section 4, Chapter V, Chapter VII and Chapter XII and Article 78 shall apply from 2 August 2025, with the exception of Article 101. The GPAI public training-content summary in Article 53(1)(d) therefore applies from 2 August 2025 under Article 113(b), except Article 101. It did not start on 2 August 2026. This page does not invent a 2 August 2026 start date for GPAI.
Article 50 sits in Chapter IV. Chapter IV is not named in Article 113(a), Article 113(b), or Article 113(c). Article 113 second paragraph applies the rest of the Regulation from 2 August 2026. Article 50 therefore applies from 2 August 2026 under that residual. Commission Article 50 materials state the same date as guidance, not as a rewrite of Article 113. Those dates are not one number.
Article 113(c) keeps Article 6(1) and the corresponding obligations — Annex I product-embedded high-risk — on 2 August 2027, not 2 August 2026. This page does not invent a 2 August 2026 date for Annex I. Article 111(3) gives providers of GPAI models placed on the market before 2 August 2025 until 2 August 2027 to take the necessary steps. That is not Article 113(c). Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 is an amending regulation. Counsel reads the authentic operative article of any amendment. This page does not apply 2026/1744 to YOU. It does not rewrite Article 113(b) for Chapter V in the original regulation. Not legal advice.
Legal requirement versus guidance versus ShipReady recommendation
The table below labels each text. Do not treat the Article 50 label as the training-content summary, do not treat guidance as the article, and do not treat a product surface as a determination. Last verified 9 September 2026. Not legal advice.
| Text | What it is | What this page does not do |
|---|---|---|
| Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Article 53(1)(d) | Legal requirement — public training-content summary for GPAI providers, only if YOU are a GPAI provider. In force 2 August 2025 under Article 113(b), except Article 101. Distinct from Article 50. | Does not determine that YOU have to publish a summary. Does not invent a 2 August 2026 start date for GPAI. This product does not publish YOUR summary. |
| Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Article 50 | Legal requirement — transparency for certain AI systems, including labeling and marking of AI-generated content, only if those limbs apply. In force 2 August 2026 under Article 113 second paragraph. Distinct from Article 53(1)(d). | Does not treat an Article 50 mark as discharging Article 53(1)(d). Does not determine that YOU have to label content. |
| AI Office Explanatory Notice and Template (24 July 2025) | AI Office material — the template Article 53(1)(d) says to use. Guidance on the form, not a substitute for the article. Official library URL last verified 9 September 2026. | Does not fill the template for YOU. Does not invent a template URL. This product does not publish YOUR summary. |
| GPAI Code of Practice and Commission GPAI guidelines | Commission / AI Office materials. Guidance, not the regulation. The Code is a voluntary tool. Article 53(4) permits relying on an Article 56 code to demonstrate compliance until a harmonised standard is published. Article 56(2)(b) names the adequate level of detail for the training-content summary as a code topic. | Does not treat the Code as replacing Article 53(1)(d). |
| Commission Article 50 transparency guidelines and Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content | Commission / AI Office materials. Guidance, not the regulation. They address Article 50 marking and labeling, a different duty from Article 53(1)(d). | Does not treat those Article 50 materials as the training-content-summary template. |
| This product's AI-governance surface | ShipReady recommendation: an inventory and posture of facts the organisation recorded. Not a published summary. Not legal advice. | Does not publish YOUR training-content summary. Does not fill the AI Office template. Does not determine that YOU have to publish a summary. A named human still owns the assessment. |
What to do now
As of last verification on 9 September 2026, Article 53 GPAI duties, including the public training-content summary, have applied since 2 August 2025 under Article 113(b), except Article 101. Article 50 labeling and marking sit on the original 2 August 2026 residual. Article 111(3) gives providers of models placed on the market before 2 August 2025 until 2 August 2027 to take the necessary steps. The list below is operational preparation. It is not a determination that YOU have to publish a training-content summary. Walk it with counsel.
- Ask counsel whether YOU are a provider of a general-purpose AI model under Articles 3(3) and 3(63). This page does not run that test. Marking eu_ai_act in an obligation map is not that determination and is not a summary-publication determination.
- If counsel finds YOU are a GPAI provider, walk Article 53(1)(d) as written and the current AI Office template at the Commission library URL cited above. Do not treat an Article 50 watermark as that summary. Do not date the summary duty from 2 August 2026. Article 113(b) is 2 August 2025. This product does not publish YOUR summary.
- Keep Article 50 separate. If counsel finds an Article 50 limb applies, that is labeling and marking of AI-generated content, in force 2 August 2026 under Article 113 second paragraph. Commission Article 50 guidelines are guidance, not the regulation.
- The EU AI Act overview on this site is the pillar page. The requirements-in-force-2026 guide on this site is the Article 113 dates page. The GPAI-requirements guide on this site is the Article 53 baseline page. The technical-documentation guide on this site is the Articles 11 and 53 Annex IV/XI/XII page. The copyright-policy guide on this site is the Article 53(1)(c) page.
Checklist
This is a question list, not a determination that YOU have to publish a training-content summary, and not a filing. Walk it with counsel. The GPAI-requirements guide on this site is the Article 53 baseline page.
- Does the Act apply to YOU at all? Articles 2 and 3. This page does not run that test.
- Are YOU a provider of a general-purpose AI model? Articles 3(3) and 3(63). Article 53(1)(d) is a legal requirement only if that applies. This page does not determine that YOU are a GPAI provider and does not determine that YOU have to publish a summary.
- Does Article 53(2) as written actually except YOUR public summary? Points (c) and (d) are not in that exception. This page does not qualify YOUR licence.
- Is Article 50 the same as the training-content summary? No. Article 50 is labeling and marking of AI-generated content, a different duty, in force 2 August 2026.
- Did the GPAI public-summary duty start 2 August 2026? No. Article 113(b) is 2 August 2025, not 2026.
- Does this page file our summary, or does the product publish it? No. This product does not publish YOUR summary and does not fill the AI Office template.
- Document the assessment, including a not-required decision. This page does not keep YOUR file.
Where this shows up in ShipReady Metrics
The bundled framework key eu_ai_act is customer-visible. Its version label is Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 high-risk obligations (starter subset). It is not in INTERNAL_TESTER_ONLY_FRAMEWORKS. The control-set is a starter subset, illustrative, to be tailored by a compliance owner; not legal advice; not a conformity determination; not CE marking. Readiness is not compliance and not an EU-database registration.
If you already have a session: signed-in app → Compliance → AI governance holds the AI inventory and AI-governance posture. That inventory can record dataset and model provenance the organisation declared. Recording provenance is not a published Article 53(1)(d) summary, is not a filled AI Office template, and is not a determination that YOU have to publish a summary. Marking in-scope is not a summary-publication determination and not auto-filing. A named human still owns the assessment.
This product does not publish YOUR training-content summary, does not fill the AI Office template, does not write a copyright policy, does not apply Article 50 marks, does not file with the AI Office, and does not issue certifications. The obligation map lists frameworks the organisation has marked in-scope, including eu_ai_act if that mark is set. Marking eu_ai_act in-scope is not a determination that you have to publish a training-content summary.
This page does not document a public demo URL. There is no public EU AI Act demo path. This product does not start a clock.
Primary sources (last verified 9 September 2026)
Every regulatory or guidance claim on this page is taken from one of these. If a later revision of a source changes the rule, the date above is how you can see we have not re-checked yet.
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of 13 June 2024 (Artificial Intelligence Act), Articles 50, 53(1)(d), 53(2), 111(3) and 113 and Recital 107, is a legal requirement only if it applies. Entry into force 1 August 2024. Article 113(a) 2 February 2025; Article 113(b) 2 August 2025; general application 2 August 2026; Article 113(c) Article 6(1) from 2 August 2027. The AI Office Explanatory Notice and Template for the Public Summary of Training Content (Commission library page, publication 24 July 2025) is the current official template URL as of last verification. Commission AI Act pages, the GPAI Code of Practice, Commission GPAI-scope guidelines, Commission Article 50 transparency guidelines, and the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content are Commission / AI Office materials — guidance, not the regulation. The GPAI Code of Practice is voluntary and does not replace Article 53. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 is an amending regulation. These are not a complete world list. Not legal advice.
The EU AI Act overview on this site is the pillar page. The requirements-in-force-2026 guide on this site is the Article 113 dates page. The GPAI-requirements guide on this site is the Article 53 baseline page. The GPAI-systemic-risk guide on this site is the Article 51–55 page. The provider-vs-deployer guide on this site is the Articles 3, 16, 25 and 26 page. The technical-documentation guide on this site is the Articles 11 and 53 Annex IV/XI/XII page. The EU AI Act framework guide on this site is the education page under frameworks. The copyright-policy guide on this site is the Article 53(1)(c) page.
Frequently asked questions
Is this legal advice?
No. It is a dated map of the GPAI public training-content summary distilled from Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Article 53(1)(d), with Article 50 labeled as a different duty and Commission / AI Office materials labeled as guidance, not the regulation. Whether those articles apply to YOU, and whether YOU have to publish a training-content summary, is a legal question for counsel on your facts. This page does not start a clock and does not file with the AI Office.
Does this page file our summary?
No. This page does not file a training-content summary with the AI Office, does not publish YOUR summary, and does not fill the AI Office template. Mapping a row is not a finding that the Act applies, that YOU are a GPAI provider, or that Article 53(1)(d) binds YOU. Counsel applies Article 53(1)(d) to YOUR facts. Last verified 9 September 2026.
Does Article 50 equal the training-content summary?
No. Article 53(1)(d) is a public summary of the content used to train a general-purpose AI model, according to a template provided by the AI Office. Article 50 is transparency for certain AI systems: informing people they are interacting with an AI system, machine-readable marking of synthetic outputs, and deployer labeling of deep fakes and certain public-interest text. They are different duties, on different dates. Article 113(b) puts Article 53 on 2 August 2025. Article 50 sits on 2 August 2026. Last verified 9 September 2026.
Did the GPAI public-summary duty start on 2 August 2026?
No. Article 113(b) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 applies Chapter V from 2 August 2025, with the exception of Article 101. Chapter V includes Article 53. That is not 2 August 2026. This page does not invent a 2 August 2026 start date for GPAI. Article 111(3) is 2 August 2027 for models already on the market before 2 August 2025. Last verified 9 September 2026.
Does the GPAI Code of Practice replace Article 53(1)(d)?
No. The GPAI Code of Practice is a voluntary tool. Article 53(4) permits relying on an Article 56 code to demonstrate compliance until a harmonised standard is published. That permission does not replace Article 53(1)(d). Commission transparency guidelines and the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated Content address Article 50, a different duty. Last verified 9 September 2026.
Does marking eu_ai_act in-scope mean we have to publish a summary?
No. Marking the bundled framework key eu_ai_act in-scope on the obligation map is not a determination that you have to publish a training-content summary, is not a finding that Article 53(1)(d) applies, and is not auto-filing. Counsel applies that article to YOUR facts. A named human still owns the assessment.
Does ShipReady publish our training-content summary?
No. This product does not publish YOUR training-content summary and does not fill the AI Office template. Signed-in app → Compliance → AI governance can record dataset and model provenance the organisation declared. That record is not a published Article 53(1)(d) summary. This product does not file with the AI Office. A named human still owns the assessment.
Published by ShipReady Metrics, an evidence-based technology and compliance intelligence platform. This guide is educational and vendor-neutral.